Peter J. Wasilko

Peter J. Wasilko wearing a dark suit and orange tie.

Peter J. Wasilko, Esq. J.D., LL.M.

Peter J. Wasilko, Esq. J.D., LL.M.

Attorney, Independent Scholar, and Programmer

Attorney, Independent Scholar, and Programmer
  • Résumé / Curriculum Vitae

    Thanks for stopping by my homepage!

    This a an annotated & hyperlinked edition of my Résumé / Curriculum Vitae (CV) in which you can learn more about my objective, publications, bar admission, experience, interests, organization memberships, and education.

    I am also using this server to host historical archives of material related to The French-American Law & AI Conference Series.

  • Objective

    In a nutshell, I'm a pragmatically oriented lawyer and technologist who believes that attorneys need to combine their traditional skills with a substantive mastery of emerging information technologies in order to:

    • Spot technology related legal issues.
    • Render the highest level of proactive advice to clients.
    • Make prudent use of technology both in and outside the courtroom.
    • Preserve the economically viability of the practice of law.
    • Participate as active design partners in the development of future technologies.
    • Devise the best bespoke technology enabled solutions to complex problems in the spheres of business and politics.

    Indeed, many problems we face as lawyers have direct analogs that have been rigorously studied in Computer and Information Science, and many of the methodologies developed to create software products hold great potential for use in law firms and public law processes.

    I have spent decades exploring innovation management processes and surveying enabling technologies along with their potential applications to the profession and beyond. Now I want to find ways, through my writings and related projects, to educate members of the profession and the public at large as to how much can be gained through this interdisciplinary approach to lawyering in the future.

  • Publications

    Beyond Compliance: Understanding the Legal Aspects of Information System Administration

    Chapter 4 in Organizational, Legal, and Technological Dimensions of Information System Administration / IGI Global, 2014

    This peer reviewed chapter focused on how making the right technological choices can facilitate regulatory compliance, leading to reduced legal costs and greater agility in crafting responses to emerging sources of risk. It also offered a broad survey of both the nature of Legal Risk and those areas of law most likely to impact the specific risks faced in the IT Sector.

    Law, Architecture, Gameplay, and Marketing

    Chapter 29 in Business, Technological, and Social Dimensions of Computer Games: Multidisciplinary Developments / IGI Global, 2011

    In this peer reviewed chapter, I offer Game Designers and Developers a broad survey of the legal issues related to computer games and virtual worlds with an emphasis on their business ramifications. I also introduce The Principle of Severability as a critical prerequisite to incentivizing the contribution of User Generated Content, along with a novel set of guidelines to help programmers follow a Litigation Savvy Development Process.

  • Bar Admission

    New York State — Admitted to the Practice of Law on March 3rd, 1993.

    I remain a member in good standing of the New York State Bar and I have never been the subject of any disciplinary complaints or actions.

    After my admission to the bar, I was briefly engaged by a small law firm helping them with transactional work until an unexpected economic downturn abruptly eliminated the position, leading me to transition to the Nonprofit Sector.

  • Experience

    March 2, 2019 to Present — Founder, Founders' Quadrangle

    Founders' Quadrangle is an unincorporated association of academics interested in exploring the design space for possible Universities of the Future.

    October 1, 2014 to Present — Research and Writing

    Following the dissolution of the IEUC I've been combing through the organization's research and the wider computing literature to organize all of the most germane materials into a publishable form. My goal here is to develop a comprehensive survey textbook suitable for use in Law School, MBA, and other Graduate Level Programs by distilling those salient features of a complete Computer Science course sequence that one would remember and find relevant in one's current non-CS course of study. In addition to introducing a rich body of technical material, it will also imbue the reader with the history, culture, and language of computer professionals to facilitate working with them in the real world. By skipping some of the book's more advance materials, the text should also be suitable for use at the undergrad level as part of a general education requirement in computing. I am also including extensive literature and online resource pointers to insure its value as a long term reference work.

    Inorder to achieve a book design and page layout that will accomodate these diverse use cases, I spent much of 2018 and 2019 developing expertise in LaTeX Typesetting Technology and in creating a LaTeX pre-processor to facilitate authoring content containing nested categorized notes with interlinked citations and biliographic commentary. As the Fall Semester unfolds I will be focused on substantive writing. I am also looking beyond the textbook to how its philosophy can fit into a re-envisioning of Higher Eduation at large.

    November 22, 2002 to October 1, 2014 — The Institute for End User Computing, Inc.

    Founder, President, Executive Director, Chair of the Board,
    Treasurer, Chief Technology Officer, Webmaster, and In-House Counsel

    After a number of years of pre-incorporation planning, starting with an informal research project in Digital Libraries in which I built up an interdisciplinary circle of advisors and colleagues, I founded The IEUC, subsequently managing all facets of its operation as its Principal Investigator until its dissolution on October 1st, 2014. During the Institute's run, I secured the organization's 501(c)(3) Tax Exemption and subsequent classification as a Public Charity.

    I also served as its Principle Investigator, surveying enabling technologies, preparing educational materials released through the organization's website, developed the organization's graphic identity, wrote custom software to support its website and regulatory compliance, recruited and managed volunteers, attended many academic conferences, handled the organization's finances, bookkeeping, and regulatory compliance. Unfortunately, the state of the economy led to a gradual erosion of the organization's financial support ultimately forcing us into dissolution.

  • Interests

    For most of my adult life I have been programming computers and deepening my knowledge of the technologies involved. My favorite programming languages are Lisp Dialects like Scheme & Racket, Javascript, Ruby, and Go, but I have also experimented with more exotic languages like Forth, Prolog, and many others.

    My primary technical interests are End User Programming, Programming Language Design, Hypertext, and Law and AI. Over the years I have amassed a staggering personal library with volumes related to most areas of Computer and Information Science, Innovation Management, and of course, Law.

    I am a lifelong resident of New York State currently residing in the hills of Ossining, New York, overlooking the historic Hudson River approximately one hour North of Midtown Manhattan by train.

    I also enjoy gardening and other offline activities.

  • Organizations

    The New York State Bar Association (NYSBA), The NYSBA's Intellectual Property Section, The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), The IEEE Computer Society, and the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).

    In the New York State Bar Association I have been a member of the IP Section's Internet and Technology Law Committee before which I've spoken on such topics as Web Accessibility Law and Legal XML; I have served rotations on The Committee on Legal Education and Admission to the Bar (where I argued for making substantive technological training part of the law school curriculum) and the Law Office Economics and Management Committee (to which I have just been re-appointed).

  • Education

    Graduate Work

    I studied law at Syracuse University's College of Law where I earned my J.D. in 1991 and my LL.M. in Taxation with a related concentration in Technology Law* in 1992.

    On May 17, 1997 I was awarded a Certificate in recognition of my completion of the Law, Technology, and Management Program (now known as the Technology Commercialization Law Program ) which included work in the College of Law's Technology Transfer Research Center.

    I was also granted considerable latitude in augmenting my formal legal studies with work in the School of Information Studies and the Whitman School of Management's Innovation Management Program.

    *Syracuse's LL.M. in Taxation was subsequently retired and replaced with an LL.M. in American Law now offered to foreign trained legal professionals.

    Undergraduate Studies

    I graduated magna cum laude from The University at Albany in 1988 with a B.A. majoring in Political Science with a History minor.

    When I wasn't occupied with my formal classes, I spent most of my free time independently reading through the Computer Science stacks in the library.

    I also had the pleasure of meeting some famous figures through the Speakers Forum club and sparked my interests in management by working as one of the managers of the on-campus University Cinemas.

courthouse-facade

The French-American Law & AI Conference Series

These meetings were organized in the mid 1990's and ran until 2001 when the third conference in the series had to be canceled due to the 9/11 terror attack.

The key theme of the conference series was the fundamental notion that Lawyers can and should be active participants in the development of new information technologies — both for our own pragmatic law office economics considerations and to be able to deliver the best possible advice to our clients.

I have reproduced excerpts from the conference websites in this space because of their historical merit and because recent advances in Open Source enabling technologies have created a golden opportunity for a new generation of legal technologists to pick up where they left off.

  • The First French-American Conference on Law and AI

    Syracuse Law and the Sorbonne present a conference for The Builders and Users of Legal Expert Systems in Syracuse, NY on April 15-16, 1996.

    Syracuse Law and the Sorbonne present a conference for The Builders and Users of Legal Expert Systems in Syracuse, NY on April 15-16, 1996.

    In the spring of 1996 the Syracuse University College of Law hosted The First French-American Conference on Law & Artificial Intelligence .

    For a better sense of what the conference was like, we have reproduced and updated the conference web site which Mr. Wasilko developed for the event.

    At this remote date, new copies of the Conference Proceedings are no longer known to be available. However, if any item is of particular interest to you, contact Mr. Wasilko and he would be happy to augment these notes with a more detailed discussion of it.

  • LAW AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE DESCRIPTION

    Legal Expert Systems: Theory meeting Practice

    Unlike other conferences, this conference on Artificial Intelligence Technology (AIT) is intended:

    • To provide a forum for students to demonstrate their work.
    • To permit practitioners, who would not normally publish, to demonstrate their work.
    • To provide practitioners and others with the opportunity to learn:
      • The advantages and disadvantages of using expert systems, and
      • What the field of AIT has to offer currently, via workshops with those who are using expert systems in their practice.
    • To focus on substantive rather than administrative uses of expert systems, including, for example:
      • Using expert systems for case evaluations and other legal tasks, and
      • Using expert systems in legal education.
    Bridging the Gap

    The builders and users of legal expert systems rarely have the opportunity to see a panoramic view of how their work intersects.

    This conference will provide legal professionals (practitioners, jurists, academics) with the opportunity to:

    • Look at some of the existing and the planned legal expert systems experiments;
    • Reflect on the practical and theoretical lessons to be learned from them;
    • Engage in a dialogue with builders of legal expert systems about the challenges and rewards involved in adapting expert system technology to legal issues.

    Both civil law and common law systems will be presented. The differences in legal traditions between civil law and common law should provide a rich environment for exploring what different Artificial Intelligence approaches can offer to the legal professions of both traditions.

  • Law & AI 1 : Pre-Conference Tutorial

    Syracuse Law and the Sorbonne present a conference for The Builders and Users of Legal Expert Systems in Syracuse, NY on April 15-16, 1996.


    This conference will provide legal professionals (practitioners, jurists, academics) with the opportunity to examine how their work can benefit from artificial intelligence techniques. In keeping with this aim the organizers announce a pre-conference tutorial, for Sunday 14 April 1996.

    The TUTORIAL

    The pre-conference tutorial is aimed at lawyers and law students who have little or no understanding of artificial intelligence applications in law. It will provide an overview of the way artificial intelligence has been used in building commercially practical systems. It will also explain the current research approaches in artificial intelligence and law, and how they will in future provide for useful commercial legal applications. It will discuss some of the limitations of artificial intelligence in law, as well as its great benefits.

    There will be an afternoon session where delegates actually get to build a small legal expert system.

    INSTRUCTORS
    Dan Hunter
    Emmanuel College, Cambridge, England
    Michael Aikenhead
    Centre for Law & Computing, Durham University; Durham, England
    REGISTRATION:

    10:45 am - 11:30 am, at the Syracuse College of Law

    MORNING SESSION -- THEORY (11:30 am - 1:00 pm)
    1. Introduction
      • What is Artificial Intelligence?
      • Why Artificial Intelligence & law?
    2. Current commercial systems
      • Logic and rules
      • Legal expert systems
      • Computer assisted document drafting aids
    3. Future commercial systems
      • Theories of legal reasoning
      • Induction
      • Case based reasoning
      • Neural networks
    4. Conclusions
      • What benefits are there currently for legal practice?
      • What benefits will there be in future for legal practice?
    LUNCH: 1:00 pm - 1:45 pm
    AFTERNOON SESSION -- HANDS-ON

    (1:45 pm - 4:30 pm, with 15 minute break)

    • Delegates will get to build a small legal expert system, with hypertext, in an area of US law.
    • You will be taught how to translate statutes into expert system rules and how to build hypertext.
    • Demonstrations of a number of commercial systems will also be given.

    No experience with computers is assumed.

    DATE/TIME:

    Sunday, 14 April 1996, 11:30am to 4:30pm

  • Law & AI 1 : Schedule --- Monday, April 15

    Syracuse Law and the Sorbonne present a conference for The Builders and Users of Legal Expert Systems in Syracuse, NY on April 15-16, 1996.


    Monday: April 15th
    Morning
    Computerizing Law: Advances, Prospects, Applications, Limits
    (Lucien Mehl, Conseiller D' Etat Honoraire, France)
    Bridging the Gap Between Jurisprudence and Actual Practice
    (Tina Smith, University of Utrecht, Netherlands)
    Improving the Quality of Legal Services Through Computer Aided Checklists
    (Marc Lauritsen, Harvard Law School, USA)
    An Implementation of Eisner v. Macomber
    (L. Thorne McCarty, Rutgers University, USA)
    User Reaction to EVIDENT, An Evidence Expert System
    (Janet Zeide, Jay Liebowitz, George Washington University, USA)

    Demonstrations and Discussions
    (The following Demos were available throughout the Conference) :

    Improving the Quality of Legal Services Through Computer Aided Checklists
    (Marc Lauritsen, Harvard Law School)
    EVIDENT: A U.S. Rules of Evidence Advisor
    (Janet Zeide, Jay Liebowitz, George Washington University)
    KONTERM WORKSTATION: From legal information retrieval to intelligent legal commentary
    (Erich Schweighofer, University of Vienna)
    BRUITEX: A "Global" expert system for municipal decision-making in the field of noise and environment
    (Daniele Bourcier, CNRS-idl - Universite, de Paris 1)
    JIMLOG: An expert system in the field of Immigration Law
    (Gerard Clerque, Paris)
    FRENCH LAW TUTORIAL: A Multimedia tool for training Commercial School students
    (Christian Roquilly, Paris)
    LEXHARNESS: A tool for intelligent searching of law databases
    (Thorne McCarty, Leon Shklar, Rutgers University)
    Welding Regulations Compliance Manager
    (Richard Wood, Kaman Sciences Corporation)
    Tax Law System
    (Marcia Suelzer, Commerce Clearing House)
    A Wrongful Dismissal Advisor
    (Gerri Downie, Dr. Mary McLeish,University of Guelph, Canada)
    A Minor's Consent (to Medical Treatment) Advisor
    (Patrice Crooks, Syracuse College of Law)
    A Medical Consent Advisor ("Do Not Resuscitate" Orders)
    (Liz Mutty, Syracuse College of Law)
    CHINADVISOR: Advises on Regulations Governing Foreign Investment in China
    (Jennifer Bailey, Syracuse College of Law)
    The Internet, The World Wide Web (WWW), and Computer-Assisted Legal Research
    (Team from Syracuse College of Law)

    Afternoon
    Bridging the Gap between Human and Computer Languages
    (Serge Diebolt, CNRS-idl - Universit, de Paris 1, France)
    How to Handle the Concept of Time
    (Rim Faiz, Universit, de Paris - Dauphine, France)
    Introducing Lawyers to the Differences Among Expert Systems, Fuzzy Logic, and Neural Nets
    (Can Isik, Computer Engineering, Syracuse University, USA)
    Understanding Legal Neural Networks
    (Dan Hunter, Emmanuel College, England)
    Computer Tools for Drafting Legislation: The Case of the "Code for Local Authorities"
    (Judge Elizabeth Catta, Chief de Mission de Codification; Veronique Tauziac, Manager of Information Systems, France)
    Selecting an Appropriate Expert System Shell
    (Richard Wood, Kaman Sciences Corporation, USA)
    Demonstrations and Discussion
    Monday Evening: Dinner at Sheraton University Inn
  • Law & AI 1 : Schedule --- Tuesday, April 16

    Syracuse Law and the Sorbonne present a conference for The Builders and Users of Legal Expert Systems in Syracuse, NY on April 15-16, 1996.


    Tuesday: April 16th
    Morning
    Licensing Considerations for Builders and Users of Legal Expert Systems
    (Theodore Hagelin, Syracuse College of Law, USA)
    Legal Issues Generated by Lawsuits Involving Expert Systems
    (Team from Syracuse College of Law, USA)
    Developing a Commercial Expert System in Tax Law
    (Marcia Suelzer, Commerce Clearing House, USA)
    Law Firm Management of Expert Systems
    (Mohan Tanniru, School of Management, Syracuse University, USA)
    Demonstrations and Discussions
    Afternoon
    Tutorials
    Introduction to Building Legal Expert Systems - Lecture Format
    (Richard Wood, Kaman Sciences Corporation, USA)
    Introduction to Building Legal Expert Systems - Hands On Format
    (Team from Syracuse University, USA)
    Intermediate Legal Expert Systems - Hands On Format
    (Dan Hunter and Michael Aikenhead, England)
    Using Microsoft Excel to Build Legal Expert Systems - Hands On Format
    (Mohan Tanniru, Michelle Holguin, Syracuse University, USA)
    Demonstrations and Discussions
  • Law & AI 1 : Conference Proceedings

    Syracuse Law and the Sorbonne present a conference for The Builders and Users of Legal Expert Systems in Syracuse, NY on April 15-16, 1996.


    Select Contents of the Law & AI 1 Conference Proceedings
    Fact Sheets ::
    • A Map of the Syracuse University Campus
    • A Flyer for Informatique Droit Linguistique (The Computing, Law, Linguistics Institute) at Universite de paris 1
    • A CASE (Computer Applications & Software Engineering) Center Newsletter
    • A Participant List
    • "Tuesday Tutorial Information"
    • Various daily schedules
    • Various presentation outlines
    • A list of Demonstrations scheduled for Monday & Tuesday
    • Demonstration of ES Development within an Excel Environment
    • Sample data for case-based analysis
    • Conference Program : Bridging the Gap Between The Builders and The Users of Legal Expert Systems
    • Tort Liability Issues Involving Expert Systems
    • Using multimedia in law education
    Demonstration Systems ::
    • "Demonstration - of a Wrongful Dismissal Advisor"
    • Slides from "A Wrongful Dismissal Advisor"
    • JIMLOG - "An Expert System to Help Young Foreigners Be Aware of Their Rights"
    • Slides from "Developing a 'Tax Assistant'"
    • "Investing in China: A User's Guide"
    Resource Guides ::
    • A review of expert system shell programs reprinted from AI Expert Magazine.
    • A Bibliography of "Some Books:" and "Some General References" for "Research In Expert Systems/Knowledge Based Systems Area"
    • "Use of Netscape for Expert Legal Systems Research"
    Major Packets ::
    • Introduction to Knowledge-Based Systems
    • Report Summary - Knowledge-Based Technology Applications Center (KBTAC) Seminar Series
    • Abstract
    • Contents
    • Goals and Content of Seminar
    • KTBTAC - An EPRI Center for Utility Application of Knowledge-based Systems
    • Demonstration of Utility Knowledge-based Systems
    • What Are Knowledge-based Systems?
    • Why Use Knowledge-based Systems?
    • Knowledge Representation Inferenceing
    • Prototyping - An Example
    • When is a Knowledge-based System Applicable?
    • Trends in Knowledge-based System Development
    • Steps in Knowledge-based System Projects and KBTAC Support
    • Slides on "Management of ES"
    • "Survey of Legal Expert Systems"
    Primary Conference Presentation Materials ::
    • The role of technology in bridging the gap between legal cultures
    • Improving the Quality of Legal Services Through Computer Aided Checklists
    • A Wrongful Dismissal Advisor
    • Computerizing Legal Decision Making
    • An Implementation of Eisner v. Macomber
    • Methods for Automatic Legal Construction: From Facts to Legal Notions
    • EVIDENT and Its Introduction to Law Professors
    • Bridging the Gap between Human and Computer Languages : Using logic to detect implicit arguments
    • Bridging the Gap between Jurisprudence and Actual Practice
    • How to handle the concept of time
    • Computer tools for drafting legislation : the case of the code for local authorities
    • Commercializing legal neural networks
    • Introducing Lawyers to the Differences Among Expert Systems, Fuzzy Logic and Neural Nets
    • LexHarness: Providing Flexible Access to Legal Information on the World-Wide Web
    • Licensing Consideration for Builders and Users of Legal Expert Systems
    • DNR-Advisor: Obtaining a Patient's Consent to a "Do Not Resuscitate" Order
    • Expert System Technology in the Medical Administration Setting: Minor
    • Consent to Medical Treatment in California
    • The KONTERM Workstation - From Information Retrieval to the Intelligent Electronic Commentary
  • The Second French-American Conference on Law and Artificial Intelligence

    The Second French-American Conference on Law and Artificial Intelligence

    Held on June 11-13 of 1998 at the Ecole de Hautes Etudes Commerciales du Nord in Nice, France
    Sponsored by the Universite de Paris 1, Universite de Picardie Ecole de Hautes Etudes Commerciales du Nord (EDHEC) and Syracuse University College of Law

    The second conference was intended to provide users and designers of legal expert systems with a forum to consider such topics as:

    • Lawyers and the revolution of networks.
    • The conception and the development of intelligent systems and agents.
    • Legal and administrative applications of neuronal technologies, expert systems, dynamic systems, and chaotic or non linear models.
    • New legal services available as a result of law-related networks, databases, search engines, data warehouse, etc.
    • The impact, on legal information systems, of changes within the legal professions; the design, development and use of multimedia products for legal teaching.
    • The concepts of collective information systems and the "legal village."
  • Proceedings

    Sadly the original conference website maintained by the conference co-organizer Professeur Christophe Roquilly is no longer available online; however the "Proceedings of the Second French-American Conference on AI and Law" were published in 1998 by EDHEC, so it may be possible to track down a hard copy.

  • The Third French-American Conference on Law and Artificial Intelligence

    sponsors

    The Third-French American Conference on Law and Artificial Intelligence would have returned to Syracuse Law after the highly successful Second Conference in France.

    Papers had already been submitted and many travel arrangements were already in place when the 9/11 attack disrupted transatlantic travel and the Conference Organizers were forced to make the hard decision to cancel the event. Accordingly, not much of substance was ever made available in digital form other than preliminary website content reproduced here.

  • Institutional Sponsors

    Syracuse University College of Law
    Syracuse, New York
    EDHEC School of Management
    France
    CNRS, Centre de Theorie du Droit, Universite of Paris 10
    France
  • Conference Conveners

    Patricia Hassett,
    Syracuse University College of Law * Syracuse, New York USA
    Daniele Bourcier,
    University of Paris I0, CNRS * Paris, France
    Christophe Roquilly,
    EDHEC School of Management * France
  • Scientific Committee

    Danièle Bourcier
    University of Paris 10, C.N.R.S. * France
    Eric Caprioli
    Legal Sciences Department, EDHEC, Expert at the CNUDCI * France
    Pompeu Casanovas
    Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona * Spain
    Christian Derambure
    Cabinet Bouju & Derambure * Paris, France
    Jos Dumortier
    K.U. Leuwen-ICRI * Belgium
    Christiane Féral-Schuhl
    présidente de l'Association pour le développement de l'informatique juridique (ADIJ) * France
    Jean Gasnault
    président de JURICONNEXION * France
    Marie Claude Girardot
    DG Information Society of the European Commission
    Patricia Hassett
    College of Law, Syracuse University * New York, U.S.A.
    Can Isik
    College of Engineering & Computer Science, Syracuse University * New York, U.S.A.
    Marc Lauritsen
    Capstone Practice Systems * Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.
    Jacky Legrand
    University of Paris 2 * France
    Dider Lebon
    Cabinet Triplet & Associés * Lille, France
    Viktor Mayer-Schönberger
    JFK School of Government, Harvard University * Cambridge, Mass. U.S.A.
    Lucien Mehl
    Conseiller d’Etat, Honoraire * France
    Paulo Quaresma
    Departamento de Mathematica, Universidade de Evora * Portugal
    Abdul Paliwala
    University of Warwick * United Kingdom
    Christophe Roquilly
    Legal Sciences Department, EDHEC * France
    Erich Schweighofer
    University of Vienna * Austria
    Mohan Tanniru
    Oakland University, Rochester * Michigan, U.S.A.
    Radboud Winkels
    Computer and Law Department, University of Amsterdam * The Netherlands
    Hajime Yoshino
    Meiji Gakuin * Japan
    Peter J. Wasilko
    The Continuity Project * New York, U.S.A.
    Virginia Wise
    Harvard Law School * Cambridge, Mass. U.S.A.
  • Accommodations

    Genesee

    Overnight Accommodations:

    October 11 - 14, 2001

    Departure 10/15/01

    Sheraton Syracuse University Hotel & Conference Center
    The Sheraton Syracuse University Hotel & Conference Center

    Address: 801 University Avenue; Syracuse, NY 13210

    Phone: 315-475-3000

    Fax: 315-475-3311

    Genesee Inn - Golden Tulip
    The Genesee Inn - Golden Tulip

    Address: 1060 East Genesee Street; Syracuse, NY 13210

    Phone: 315-476-4212

    Fax: 315-471-4663

  • Venue Photos

    Syracuse University's College of Law

    Having recently completed a major capital plan, the College of Law now offers all of the latest high-tech modern amenities while retaining a classic elegance worthy of a world class academic institution.

    Classes will not be in session during the Conference, so we will have full use of these facilities.

    At dusk the old and new wings of the Law School make a striking silhouette.

    The Syracuse University College of Law at dusk.

    The Library and its professional staff maintain a perfect balance of high-tech and high-touch.

    reference carrels the-stacks electronic-research

    Broad corridors and inviting lounges encourage informal discussions.

    corridor refreshments lounge

    The College of Law has many new academic spaces.

    lecture-hall courtroom small-lecture-hall

    On-site dinning facilities complete the picture.

    food-service cafe
  • Goals & History

    GOALS

    This conference is designed to focus on how technology (including especially Internet and Internet-related technology) can improve the substantive quality of legal practice. This goal requires the cooperation of public and private sector lawyers, academics, professional regulators and others interested in harnessing technology for the benefit of all consumers of legal services.

    The conference is also designed to provide opportunities for cross-cultural exchanges so that each legal culture can benefit from the experiences and insights gained by the use of technology in other legal cultures.

    HISTORY
    Law &  AI 1

    In April 1996, the First French-American Conference on Law and Artificial Intelligence took place at Syracuse University's College of Law. The first conference was designed primarily to bridge the gap between the designers and the users of legal expert systems. The conference also sought to explore expert system approaches that used different technologies and that captured the essence of different legal systems.

    In June 1998, the Second French-American Conference on Law and Artificial Intelligence took place at EDHEC School of Management, at the Nice, France, campus. During this conference, legal academics, practitioners and computer scientists shared new developments within the field of Law and AI. The conference themes were opened to all subjects in the field of Law and Information Technologies in order to show that Law evolves with and through the machine.

    CONFERENCE TOPICS:

    The Conference is interested in addressing the issues generated by the intersection of evolving technologies (including especially Internet and Internet- related technologies) and substantive legal practice (in one or multiple legal cultures). These issues could include (by way of illustration, and not limitation):

    • LOOKING TOWARD THE FUTURE: How can technology improve the substantive quality of legal services in private legal practice, in government or corporate legal departments, in the courts, and in other legal contexts? This general topic might include (again by way of illustration rather than limitation) discussions of how technology could:

      • Improve the accessibility and lower the costs of quality legal services;
      • Promote the use of plain language in the drafting of legal texts (including legislative and judicial legal texts);
      • Automate one or more tasks in the chain of tasks involved in the provision of quality legal services;
      • Enhance the accuracy of case, risk, and outcome analyses;
      • Reduce the time and accuracy burdens of preparing legal documents, of managing legal case loads, of communicating legal ideas, and of performing other legal tasks;
      • Change the role of legal publishers and other legal information providers in the provision of quality legal services;
      • Make the laws and legal experience of foreign jurisdictions more accessible to law makers and legal practitioners in the home jurisdiction (so that foreign approaches to legal problems or issues, and the success or failure of such approaches, can enrich the policy and practice of the home jurisdiction); and,
      • Otherwise improve the substantive quality of legal practice by all legal practitioners.
    • EVALUATING EXISTING PRACTICES: How can technology and substantive law work together in practice? This general topic is intended to include discussions and evaluations of actual law and technology applications:

      • The nature and scope of all kinds of applications (including, for example, expert systems; intelligent agents; fuzzy logic systems; neural net systems; document assembly systems; case management systems; research systems; argumentation systems; e-mediation or cybertribunal systems; internet-based and intranet systems); and,
      • The positive and negative experiences flowing from the use of such applications.
  • Call for Participation

    CALL for PARTICIPATION
    
    		Papers, Workshops, Tutorials, Panels, and Posters
    							By the
    				3rd French-American Conference
    							on
    				Technology and Legal Practice
    
    				Friday & Saturday, 12 & 13 October 2001
    			Syracuse College of Law, Syracuse, New York USA
    
    CONFERENCE SPONSORS:
    
    * Syracuse University College of Law, Syracuse, New York
    * EDHEC School of Management, France
    * CNRS, Centre de Theorie du Droit, Universite of Paris 10, France
    
    WEB SITE and LIST SERVE:
    
    * The Conference's US web site address is:
    
    	http://www.law.syr.edu/law-and-ai-3/
    
    * The Conference's French web site address is:
    
    		http://legal.edhec.com/3rd_french-american_conference.htm
    
    	The French site can also be reached via Conference icon in the
    	lower right corner of the the EDHEC home page:
    
    		http://legal.edhec.com/
    
    	Both sites are now open.
    
    * Additional information about the Conference will be posted to the
    	web from time to time.
    
    * In addition, the Conference will be maintaining a list serve to
    	provide email news about the Conference to subscribers.  See
    	the web site for subscription instructions or send email to
    	law-and-ai-3@law.syr.edu with "subscribe <your name> <your email address>" in the subject or body of the message.
    
    CONFERENCE GOALS:
    
    * This conference is designed to focus on how technology (including
    	especially Internet and Internet-related technology) can
    	improve the substantive quality of legal practice. This goal
    	requires the cooperation of public and private sector lawyers,
    	academics, professional regulators and others interested in
    	harnessing technology for the benefit of all consumers of legal
    	services.
    
    * The conference is also designed to provide opportunities for
    	cross-cultural exchanges so that each legal culture can benefit
    	from the experiences and insights gained by the use of
    	technology in other legal cultures.
    
    CONFERENCE HISTORY:
    
    	In April 1996, the First French-American Conference in Law and
    Artificial Intelligence took place at Syracuse University College of
    Law.  The first conference was designed primarily to bridge the gap
    between the designers and the users of legal expert systems.  The
    conference also sought to explore expert system approaches that used
    different technologies and that captured the essence of different
    legal systems.
    
    	In June 1998, the Second French-American Conference on Law and
    Artificial Intelligence took place at EDHEC School of Management, at
    the Nice, France, campus.  During this conference, legal academics,
    practitioners and computer scientists shared new developments within
    the field of Law and AI.  The conference themes were opened to all
    subjects in the field of Law and Information Technologies in order
    to show that Law evolves with and through the machine.
    
    CONFERENCE FORMATS:
    
    	The Conference is interested in using a variety of formats for
    exploring its topics (listed below).  Usual formats, such as papers,
    presentation or discussion panels, workshops, tutorials,
    demonstrations and posters, are invited.  In addition, the
    Conference is open to proposals involving other formats (including
    specifically Internet-based formats), so long as the format is
    suitable for its topic.
    
    CONFERENCE TOPICS:
    
    	The Conference is interested in addressing the issues generated
    by the intersection of evolving technologies (including especially
    Internet and Internet- related technologies) and substantive legal
    practice (in one or multiple legal cultures). These issues could
    include (by way of illustration, and not limitation):
    
    * LOOKING TOWARD THE FUTURE: How can technology improve the
    	substantive quality of legal services in private legal
    	practice, in government or corporate legal departments, in the
    	courts, and in other legal contexts?  This general topic might
    	include (again by way of illustration rather than limitation)
    	discussions of how technology could:
    
    	* Improve the accessibility and lower the costs of quality legal
    		services;
    
    	* Promote the use of plain language in the drafting of legal texts
    		(including legislative and judicial legal texts);
    
    	* Automate one or more tasks in the chain of tasks involved in the
    		provision of quality legal services;
    
    	* Enhance the accuracy of case, risk, and outcome analyses;
    
    	* Reduce the time and accuracy burdens of preparing legal documents,
    		of managing legal case loads, of communicating legal ideas, and
    		of performing other legal tasks;
    
    	* Change the role of legal publishers and other legal information
    		providers in the provision of quality legal services;
    
    	* Make the laws and legal experience of foreign jurisdictions more
    		accessible to law makers and legal practitioners in the home
    		jurisdiction (so that foreign approaches to legal problems or
    		issues, and the success or failure of such approaches, can
    		enrich the policy and practice of the home jurisdiction); and,
    
    	* Otherwise improve the substantive quality of legal practice by all
    		legal practitioners.
    
    * EVALUATING EXISTING PRACTICES: How can technology and substantive
    	law work together in practice?  This general topic is intended
    	to include discussions and evaluations of actual law and
    	technology applications:
    
    	* The nature and scope of all kinds of applications (including, for
    		example, expert systems; intelligent agents; fuzzy logic
    		systems; neural net systems; document assembly systems; case
    		management systems; research systems; argumentation systems;
    		e-mediation or cybertribunal systems; internet-based and
    		intranet systems); and,
    
    	* The positive and negative experiences flowing from the use of such
    		applications.
    
    * SUBSTANTIVE TOPICS:  The Conference welcomes law and technology
    	submissions in all substantive law fields, but it particularly
    	invites submissions describing applications in the fields of:
    
    	* Family Law;
    	* International Law;
    	* Business (including e-commerce) law;
    	* Law and Technology;
    	* Privacy;
    	* Copyright and intellectual property rights;
    	* Criminal Law; and,
    	* Legal services for groups having limited resources.
    
    	Syracuse College of Law, EDHEC, the Centre National de la
    Recherche Scientifique and the University of Paris 10 have
    particular institutional interests in these topics and would like to
    use one or more of these topics to explore the cross-cultural
    implications of technology¹s intersection with law.
    
    PROPOSAL DATES :
    
    * 2-page abstracts (500-600 words) are requested by -
    
    	 30 May 2001
    
    * Replies to the abstracts will be provided by -
    
    	 30 June 2001
    
    * Final submission requested by -
    
    	 1 September 2001
    
    ** Any supporting materials, like working software, video
    demonstrations, etc. are requested at your earliest convenience but no
    later than 1 September 2001. Please let us know now if you plan to
    submit supporting media.
    
    * Submissions should be sent electronically to:
    
    	* Patricia Hassett [phassett@law.syr.edu],
    	* Daniele Bourcier [bourcier@msh-paris.fr] and
    	* Christophe Roquilly [christophe.roquilly@edhec.edu]
    
    * See the Conference web site for additional details on submissions
    	and for the process by which the submissions will be reviewed.
    
    CONFERENCE COSTS:
    
    * The Conference Registration fee will be $ 250 (to cover a copy of
    	the conference proceedings, attendance at conference sessions
    	and presentations, incidental refreshments, lunch on Friday and
    	Saturday, and the Conference dinner on Friday night).
    
    * The Conference Registration fee will be discounted by 30% for
    	those presenting at the conference.
    
    * A limited number of bursaries for students will be available.
    	Interested students should check the Conference web site for
    	application details.
    
    * Lodging is not included in the Conference Registration fee.
    
    * See the Conference web site for additional details about airport
    	and ground transportation, lodging, maps, parking and other
    	services and facilities.
    
    
    CONFERENCE CONVENERS
    
       Patricia Hassett,
    		Syracuse University College of Law, Syracuse, New York USA
    
       Daniele Bourcier,
    		University of Paris I0, CNRS, Paris, France
    
       Christophe Roquilly,
    		EDHEC School of Management, France
    
    
    SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE (provisional)
    
    Danièle Bourcier, 		    University of Paris 10, C.N.R.S.,France
    Eric Caprioli, 			    Legal Sciences Department, EDHEC, France,
    								Expert at the CNUDCI
    Pompeu Casanovas, 		    Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain
    Christian Derambure, 		Cabinet Bouju & Derambure, Paris, France
    Jos Dumortier,		        K.U. Leuwen-ICRI, Belgium
    Marie Claude Girardot, 	    DG Information Society of the
    								European Commission
    Patricia Hassett, 		    College of Law, Syracuse University, U.S.A.
    Can Isik,				    College of Engineering & Computer Science,
    								Syracuse University, New York, U.S.A.
    Marc Lauritsen,		        Capstone Practice Systems,
    								Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.
    Jacky Legrand, 		        University of Paris 2, France
    Dider Lebon, 			    Cabinet Triplet & Associés, Lille, France
    Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, 	JFK School of Government,
    								Harvard University, U.S.A.
    Lucien Mehl,			    Conseiller d¹Etat, Honoraire, France
    Paulo Quaresma, 		    Departamento de Mathematica,
    								Universidade de Evora, Portugal
    Abdul Paliwala, 		    University of Warwick, United Kingdom
    Christophe Roquilly, 		Legal Sciences Department, EDHEC, France
    Erich Schweighofer, 		University of Vienna, Austria
    Mohan Tanniru,		        Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, U.S.A.
    Radboud Winkels, 		    Computer and Law Department,
    								University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Hajime Yoshino, 		    Meiji Gakuin, Japan
    Peter J. Wasilko,		    The Continuity Project, New York, U.S.A.
    Virginia Wise, 		        Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass. U.S.A.
    
    
    KEY WORDS:
    
    Aided Legal Services; American Law; Asian Law; Artificial
    Intelligence; Augmentation Research; Automation; Business Law;
    CAI (computer aided instruction); Case Management; Civil Law;
    Common Law; Conference	Copyright; Criminal Law;
    Cross-Cultural; CSCW (computer supported cooperative work);
    Cybertribunals; Digital Libraries; Document Assembly; Document
    Management; E-Commerce; E-Mediation; European Law; Expert
    Systems; Family Law; Foreign Law; French Law; Fuzzy Logic; HCI
    (human-computer interaction); Information Retrieval;
    Intellectual Property; Intelligent Agents; International Law;
    Internet; Intranet; Law and Technology; Legal Analysis; Legal
    Culture; Legal Ontologies; Legal Practice; Multiagent Systems;
    Neural Nets; Privacy; Software Agents